Bradbury Legal
  • Home
  • Services
    • Contract Drafting & Negotiation
    • Corporate & Commercial Advice
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Project Management & Contract Administration
    • Property Development Advice
    • Security of Payment
  • Our People
  • Updates
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Menu Menu
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

High Court reminder that it pays to take care with performance bonds

December 2016/in Contract Issues

The High Court in Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2016] HCA 47 has allowed an appeal against a decision of the NSW Court of Appeal on the construction of two unconditional performance bonds.  The appellant was the guarantor of a building company that tendered for a building contract from the respondent housing corporation.  The contract required the appellant to provide security in the form of bank guarantees.  The performance bonds were executed in favour of “New South Wales Land & Housing Department trading as Housing NSW ABN 45754121940” when in fact the beneficiary should have been ”New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation (ABN 24 960 729 253)”.  When the respondent called on the performance bonds, the bank refused to accept the demand based on the security being in favour of a non-existent entity.

The primary question concerned the obligation of the issuing bank to pay the demand of a party who claims to be the beneficiary which, as a result of common mistake, is not the beneficiary named in the performance bond.

However, the High Court held that the bank was justified in refusing to accept the demand under the performance bonds.  The bank was at risk of acting in breach of contract if it were to treat the bonds as referring to the respondent when the respondent was not the beneficiary.  The bank is usually not involved in the parties’ relationship and as such is entitled to take a “strict” approach in determining whether a demand fulfils the criteria for a demand for payment.

The High Court went on to decide that the wording of performance bonds may be rectified to reflect the true intention of the parties to the performance bond, (i.e. changing the name of the respondent in the performance bonds to “New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation”).  Rectification of the performance bonds would entitle the respondent to make a valid demand under the bonds which the bank must in turn honour.

This case highlights the importance of taking care when preparing performance bonds and bank guarantees.  It also allows banks to take a “strict” approach to such demands and alleviates the burden on banks to investigate the background of every demand for payment.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.88.87/g6u.f01.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/BRADBURY_LEGAL_FINAL_REV_transparent.png 0 0 bradburylegal https://secureservercdn.net/50.62.88.87/g6u.f01.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/BRADBURY_LEGAL_FINAL_REV_transparent.png bradburylegal2016-12-19 06:43:042018-08-20 06:44:41High Court reminder that it pays to take care with performance bonds

Categories

  • Commercial Issues
  • Construction Regulation
  • Contract Issues
  • Disputes
  • Security of Payment
  • Uncategorized

Archive

  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • October 2014

Our Address

Ground Floor, 437 Kent Street,
Sydney NSW 2000
02 9030 7400  |  info@bradburylegal.com.au

About Bradbury Legal

We are a boutique law firm providing high quality, personalised legal services to the property, development and construction industries.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation © Copyright - Bradbury Legal
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
Time not a great healer of defects claimsSummer of section 69: non-jurisdictional errors of law under the Security of...
Scroll to top